81 W (bearbeitet 81 W)
3.5 Cinewhoop Build - Are My Motors Suitable?
Hallo, I am planning to build 3.5 cinewhoop. I have In stock those motors, are they good for this purpose? I saw bardwells video that there is no need to go 6s at 3.5 inch whoop but maybe something changed
81 W
I think those are a bit too large for 3.5in
Antworten
81 W
around 1504 is where you want to be for size. these are good: https://www.getfpv.com/motors/micro-quad-motors/brotherhobby-vy-1504-5-2650kv-2950kv-3950kv-motor.html
Antworten
81 W
Autor
@LouisXVIII it's not size for 3 inch? I think i saw table at Oscar liang with motor sizes and there was 2106 biggest size for 3.5 cinewhoop
Antworten
81 W
@Cheese.injection sorry i missed this post! you can disregard my links.
Antworten
81 W
Listen to @louisxviii
Antworten
81 W (bearbeitet 81 W)
Autor
What if I would put them in? Cause I already have them from another build, and it could save my some money.
Antworten
81 W
That's a pretty big what if. They might be fine, but my guess is they are going to push more power than the quad is going to be able to stabilize. I don't know a lot about microcircuitry, but it seems like you could also fry the flight controller pushing that much power through the board.
Or maybe the FC won't be able to push that hard? I'm really not sure. Oscar Liang has some good reference material for motors. https://oscarliang.com/motors/
Antworten
81 W
This one too https://oscarliang.com/table-prop-motor-lipo-weight/
Antworten
81 W
2004 is highest recommended for 3.5" tri-blade
Antworten
81 W
Autor
Previously I was writing about this table, also from Oscar liang
Antworten
81 W
Wow...yeah, you're right. I think I was mixing the KV with the size :)
Antworten
81 W (bearbeitet 81 W)
Ok if you already have them, it's probably worth trying if you really want to, but be warned. 2105 is quite a lot bigger than a 1504 (ideal-ish size).
Edit: I saw you're building a cinewhoop. So I'm guessing the reason Oscar recommends bigger motors for cinewhoops because typically you're lifting something. If you're building this to lift a full action camera (gopro/dji action), they might be pretty good for cooling purposes.
Edit: I saw you're building a cinewhoop. So I'm guessing the reason Oscar recommends bigger motors for cinewhoops because typically you're lifting something. If you're building this to lift a full action camera (gopro/dji action), they might be pretty good for cooling purposes.
Antworten
81 W
Autor
Yeah, my goal is to carry full size gopro 12
Antworten
81 W
yeah I would just use em'. If the kv is too high you can motor limit them down anyway. It might not be the best, but it will work just fine.
Antworten
G
81 W
@Cheese.injection GEPRC SPEEDX2 2105.5-2650KV(6S) come with the GEPRC Cinelog35 HD.
All else being equal you'd have less power/performance and shorter flights using 4s. Cinelog35 has the weight of an air unit and complicated frame so if you have lighter components it should work out ok for flight time and power.
Antworten
A
Kommentar hinterlassen