Activiteitenfeed
23 juli 2026 om 06:14
How exactly this review pushback works in the Builder? I submitted the part, it got pushed back to Draft, but without any comment from the reviewer. So it is not really clear what should be improved?
There were some missing topics on the part, e.g. some pins in the ribbon connector were not labeled. They were not labeled, because I don't know how I should label them, based on the information provided from the manufacturer. Probably someone more experienced is able to do it based just on experience. The question here is what is a better way of working: guessing the pad, or leaving it unknown (like I did), so during review someone more experienced can fill this gap, when 95% of the part is already correctly done?
The part in question was GEPRC TAKER G4 45A 8Bit AIO, and ribbon cable to O3 air unit. On the manufacturer website there is only scheme with labels on the air unit side, with RX and TX cables labelled. But RX on VTX side should be TX on the FC side, if I am not mistaken. How to interpret it? I don't know, and I don't want to make a mistake that will slip the review and cause even more confusion in the builder later.
The builder require tons of parts to be drawn, and there can be people in the community willing to invest time into it, but without expertise to deliver 100%, so what is the proper workflow for such person?